NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 837 MHz
  • Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 372.5x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 1333.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 23915
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 62.027
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 February 2013
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 837 MHz
Boost clock speed 1455 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 vs 23915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 vs 62.027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

  • 3.5x more pipelines: 2688 vs 768
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8180 vs 6601
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 627 vs 421
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 9009
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 9009
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2688 vs 768
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8180 vs 6601
PassMark - G2D Mark 627 vs 421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10176 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10176 vs 9009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6601
8180
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
421
627
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
32981
23915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
87.83
62.027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
PassMark - G3D Mark 6601 8180
PassMark - G2D Mark 421 627
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 23915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 62.027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 215.546
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2901

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler
Code name TU117 GK110
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 February 2013
Place in performance rating 391 428
Type Mobile Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $2,054.59
Value for money (0-100) 5.09

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 876 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 837 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 2688
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s 187.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2688
Floating-point performance 4,709 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA