NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 87.83
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 9009
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 255.521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Code name | TU117 | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 318 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
| CUDA cores | 3840 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPort, HDMI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Height | 4.4 in | |
| Length | 10.5 in | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
