NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA P106-100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 510.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6603 vs 6357
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 255
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1860
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1680
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1860
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1680
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 June 2017
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6603 vs 6357
PassMark - G2D Mark 421 vs 255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 1680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1455 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34712 vs 32981
  • Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 87.83
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 9009
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 9009
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 1709 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Pipelines 1280 vs 768
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 34712 vs 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 163.993 vs 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12824 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12824 vs 9009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6603
6357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
421
255
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
32981
34712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
87.83
163.993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
1680
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA P106-100
PassMark - G3D Mark 6603 6357
PassMark - G2D Mark 421 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 34712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 163.993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 1680
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1705.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 448.036
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4061

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA P106-100

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP106
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 June 2017
Place in performance rating 391 425
Type Mobile Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 1709 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 1280
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s 136.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 4,400 million
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Length 250 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s 192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5