NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA P106-100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 510.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6603 vs 6357
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 255
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1860
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1860
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1680
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 19 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 vs 6357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 vs 255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34712 vs 32981
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 87.83
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 9009
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 9009
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34712 vs 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 vs 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA P106-100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | 6357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 34712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 163.993 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 12824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 12824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1680 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4061 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA P106-100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 19 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 425 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |