NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1132 MHz
- 150.8x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1132 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 768
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 6602
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 421
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 vs 32981
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 vs 87.83
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 9009
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 6602 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 421 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 vs 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 vs 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6602 | 20021 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 888 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 160720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 562.775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU117 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 95 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
