NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7832 vs 6967
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42927 vs 36141
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 105.688
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1083.926
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 8.251
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 79.029
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 520.089
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9172
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9172
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7832 vs 6967 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 vs 36141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 vs 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 vs 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 vs 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 vs 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 vs 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 9172 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 459
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2238
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2238
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7832 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 | 36141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
Place in performance rating | 353 | 396 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |