NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 962.8x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7832 vs 6935
• Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42927 vs 22536
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 113.416
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1414.794
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 6.736
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 81.206
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 417.823

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 459
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2476
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2238
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2476
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7832 6935
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	459 644
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42927 22536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3316

Compare specifications (specs)