NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E6465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon E6465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 21604.2x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 354
- 30x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6927 vs 231
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 160 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6927 vs 231 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6465
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon E6465 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41315 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | 354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6927 | 231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon E6465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | TU117 | Caicos |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 381 | 441 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 160 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 370 million |
Floating-point performance | 192.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |