NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Sky 500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon Sky 500

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
1364.5x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 76 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 150 Watt
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 3585
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 3585
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 2116
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 2116
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 4764

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 27 March 2013
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 76 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682 vs 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682 vs 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703 vs 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703 vs 2116
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923 vs 4764

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500

Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
2.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3356
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3356
Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 41333
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 551 vs 430

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	5116 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	5116 vs 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	74902 vs 41333
PassMark - G2D Mark	551 vs 430

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

3585

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

3585

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

2116

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

2116

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

5116

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

5116

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41333

74902

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

551

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6923

4764

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Sky 500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	2116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	5116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	5116
Geekbench - OpenCL	41333	74902
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	551
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923	4764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1096.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		89.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		247.642

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Sky 500
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Pitcairn
Launch date	27 May 2019	27 March 2013
Place in performance rating	381	510
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		2,432 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count		1
Dual-link DVI support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		242 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	154 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	4800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5