NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 9258.9x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1800 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41333 vs 8743
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 365
- 12.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 571
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41333 vs 8743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 365 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 vs 571 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41333 | 8743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 365 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | 571 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | TU117 | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 381 | 603 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Price now | $275.14 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |