NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 902 MHz
479x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 22920

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 902 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	41349 vs 22920

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 7682
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 7682
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 430
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8059 vs 6923

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12657 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12657 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3703
PassMark - G2D Mark	543 vs 430
PassMark - G3D Mark	8059 vs 6923

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41349

22920

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

543

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6923

8059

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	41349	22920
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	543
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923	8059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		355.166

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK110B
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	381	361
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,265
Price now		$833.98
Value for money (0-100)		11.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	902 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2880
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	216.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		5,196 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5