NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 706 MHz
706.4x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 14510
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 210
Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 4432

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	41349 vs 14510
PassMark - G2D Mark	430 vs 210
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923 vs 4432

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

2.4x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1024
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
2.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 7682
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 7682
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3703
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3703
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3356
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2496 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8319 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8319 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

10873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

10873

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41349

14510

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

210

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6923

4432

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	10873
Geekbench - OpenCL	41349	14510
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	210
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923	4432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK110
Launch date	27 May 2019	5 January 2013
Place in performance rating	381	408
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2496
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,524 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5