NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1105 MHz
- 1019.6x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7194 vs 6337
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 30293
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7664
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2340
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7664
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 5 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1105 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7194 vs 6337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 30293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 456
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 456 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7194 | 6337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 697 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 30293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 426 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 112.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |