NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1105 MHz
  • 1019.6x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7194 vs 6337
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 30293
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7664
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2340
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7664
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2340
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 5 June 2017
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1105 MHz
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7194 vs 6337
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 30293
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 vs 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 vs 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 456
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1792 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 697 vs 456

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7194
6337
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
697
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
30293
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro 570
PassMark - G3D Mark 7194 6337
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 697
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 30293
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 74.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1070.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 89.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 436.958

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro 570

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 4.0
Code name TU117 Polaris 20
Launch date 27 May 2019 5 June 2017
Place in performance rating 369 426
Type Mobile workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1105 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1792
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s 112.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 5,700 million
Floating-point performance 3,584 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 217.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 6800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5