NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 570X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 570X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1244 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7135 vs 1923
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8697
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3101
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8697
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3101
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1244 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7135 vs 1923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3345 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 88 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 452
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2108 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38939 vs 38863 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 570X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7135 | 1923 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 38939 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3345 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 570X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 3 April 2108 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 337 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1244 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |