NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1178 MHz
  • 1047.7x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 148 Watt
  • 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 26878
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 148 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 26878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • Around 63% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1024
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9646 vs 7194
  • Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 456
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9313
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9313
  • Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3622 vs 3319
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1664 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9646 vs 7194
PassMark - G2D Mark 773 vs 456
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11499 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11499 vs 9313
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3622 vs 3319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7194
9646
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
773
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
26878
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3319
3622
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark 7194 9646
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 773
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 26878
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 3622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 489.884

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell 2.0
Code name TU117 GM204
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 369 356
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $329
Price now $407.76
Value for money (0-100) 28.59

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1664
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s 109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 148 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 5,200 million
CUDA cores 1664
Floating-point performance 3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 4x
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround