NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1710 MHz
  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1710 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

  • 2.9x more pipelines: 2944 vs 1024
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18818 vs 7194
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 456
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102127 vs 38863
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 9313
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3698
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3353
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 9313
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3698
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3353
  • 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10973 vs 3319
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2944 vs 1024
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 18818 vs 7194
PassMark - G2D Mark 912 vs 456
Geekbench - OpenCL 102127 vs 38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25500 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6966 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6293 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25500 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6966 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6293 vs 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10973 vs 3319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7194
18818
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
912
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
102127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
6293
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
6293
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3319
10973
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark 7194 18818
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 912
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 102127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 6293
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 6293
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 10973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 326.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3938.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 159.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1506.874

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU117 TU104
Launch date 27 May 2019 20 September 2018
Place in performance rating 369 98
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $749.99
Value for money (0-100) 32.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1710 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1515 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2944
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 13,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6