NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2944 vs 1024
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18818 vs 7194
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 456
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102127 vs 38863
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 9313
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3698
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3353
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 9313
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3698
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3353
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10973 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18818 vs 7194 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102127 vs 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10973 vs 3319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7194 | 18818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 102127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 10973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU117 | TU104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 98 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |