NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 56976
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 12750
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 56976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9973 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56976 | 64325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 18549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 18549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 228 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 194.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 10300 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
