NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 689.5x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56984 vs 44897
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 150.951
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1718.593
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 12.283
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 28.289
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 710.366
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56984 vs 44897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- 2x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 9973
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 476
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 12750
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 9973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 12750 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9973 | 10465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 603 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56984 | 44897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5530 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104B |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 312 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
