NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 756.3x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56978 vs 40196
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 157.231
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1722.566
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 12.245
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 38.225
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 518.554
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 9834
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 9834
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56978 vs 40196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 9973
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13048 vs 9973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 476 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9973 | 13048 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 847 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56978 | 40196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5223 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | GM200 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 314 |
| Launch date | 17 March 2015 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
