NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 17812
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 17812
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78882 vs 62695
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1408 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78882 vs 62695 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 502
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 12521
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 vs 502 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 vs 12521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3710 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | 810 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12521 | 12776 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78882 | 62695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU116 |
Place in performance rating | 168 | 207 |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |