NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1745 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 279.2 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25496 vs 20344
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25496 vs 20344
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15360 vs 13796
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 97930 vs 82601
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.2 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 vs 20344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 vs 20344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15360 vs 13796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97930 vs 82601 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 582 vs 567
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 582 vs 567 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 | 20344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 | 20344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | 582 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15360 | 13796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97930 | 82601 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104B |
| Place in performance rating | 126 | 136 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS | 6.636 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 139.6 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 279.2 GTexel/s | 207.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700S
