NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 230 Watt
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19421 vs 13932
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 994 vs 815
• Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122486 vs 69812
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 171.616
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 4031.404
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 16.925
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1195.863
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 13044
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 162.131
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3715
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3715
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19421 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	994 815
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	122486 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	420.465 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4156.52 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.297 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.131 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1895.111 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 30936

Compare specifications (specs)