NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- 927.8x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19404 vs 16374
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 992 vs 847
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122558 vs 84757
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 355.937
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 25.191
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 144.928
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1056.078
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 16640
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 October 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19404 vs 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 992 vs 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122558 vs 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1304 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 4156.52
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3715
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3355
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3715
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1304 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 vs 4156.52 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19404 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 992 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122558 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11190 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP100 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 105 | 89 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |