NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile

  • 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 215 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 25232
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 25232
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113010 vs 99809
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 6144 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt vs 215 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26506 vs 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26506 vs 25232
Geekbench - OpenCL 113010 vs 99809

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 602
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18253 vs 15962
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark 886 vs 602
PassMark - G3D Mark 18253 vs 15962

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3711
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26506
25232
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
602
886
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15962
18253
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
113010
99809
Name NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26506 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26506 25232
PassMark - G2D Mark 602 886
PassMark - G3D Mark 15962 18253
Geekbench - OpenCL 113010 99809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA104 TU104
Place in performance rating 116 133
Launch date 2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1575 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.35 TFLOPS
Pipelines 6144 2560
Pixel fill rate 151.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 302.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 13.6 B
CUDA cores 2560
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6 pin + 8 pin
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Width 2-Slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.6 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready