NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22894 vs 19608
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 vs 927
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154660 vs 117526
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 337.794
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 4566.815
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 31.631
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1654.321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22894 vs 19608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 vs 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 vs 117526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1654.321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 22508
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 22508
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22894 | 19608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 | 117526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 65 | 109 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |