NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- 2.1x more pipelines: 10752 vs 5120
- 3x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 160986
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 vs 543.753
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 vs 51.155
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 17213
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 17213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 10752 vs 5120 |
| Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 vs 160986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 vs 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 vs 51.155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1860 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 625.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26857 vs 4237
- 12.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 86
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 189.702
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 2347.314
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20911 vs 17833
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1860 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 625.0 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 vs 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 189.702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 2347.314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3712 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 vs 17833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 26857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1048 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 160986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 320.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 20911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4649 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 94 | 70 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 26800 million |
| Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A6000 with others
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
