NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 89.1x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2173 vs 1634
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1846
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2173 vs 1634
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1846 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 384
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1704 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70814 vs 16887
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 5088
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 5088
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70814 vs 16887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 vs 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 vs 5088 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 | 70814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 6958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 6958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 571 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 482.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1704 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
