NVIDIA T400 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 420 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16887 vs 7012
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 2652
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2173 vs 1564
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 2652
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2173 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 vs 7012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 | 7012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | TU117 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 3 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 851 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
