NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 2162.2x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec
  • Around 87% higher pipelines: 896 vs 480
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
  • 12.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 219 Watt
  • Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 4862
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 4862
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29371 vs 13566
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Dec 2020 vs 7 December 2010
Texture fill rate 94.92 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec
Pipelines 896 vs 480
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 219 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1280 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5095 vs 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5095 vs 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 vs 3325
Geekbench - OpenCL 29371 vs 13566

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 1365 MHz
  • Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 3199
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 3199
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1464 MHz vs 1365 MHz
Memory clock speed 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3668 vs 3199
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3668 vs 3199

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5095
4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5095
4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3199
3668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3199
3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3325
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29371
13566
Name NVIDIA T500 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5095 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5095 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3199 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3199 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 3325
Geekbench - OpenCL 29371 13566
PassMark - G3D Mark 3927
PassMark - G2D Mark 476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 736.185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 122.953
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T500 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Essentials

Architecture Turing Fermi 2.0
Code name TU117 GF110
Launch date 2 Dec 2020 7 December 2010
Place in performance rating 648 714
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $99.99
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 48.11

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz
Core clock speed 1365 MHz 1464 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.037 TFLOPS
Pipelines 896 480
Pixel fill rate 54.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 94.92 GTexel/s 43.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 219 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 3,000 million
CUDA cores 480
Floating-point performance 1,405.4 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None Two 6-pin
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options 3-way

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.2
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1280 MB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 152.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround