NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2947.8x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 896 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 13.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 3245
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 3245
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29371 vs 9716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 3245 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29371 vs 9716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3199
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29371 | 9716 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2840 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU117 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 648 | 756 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
