NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA TITAN RTX

AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 280 Watt vs 350 Watt
28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 8137
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 745
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 53806
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 10141
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 10141

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 December 2018 vs 26 April 2016
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	280 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	19986 vs 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	827 vs 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	138072 vs 53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25820 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25820 vs 10141

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Around 78% higher pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 4608
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3353
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2x 4096 vs 4608
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	38251 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	38251 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19986

8137

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

827

745

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

138072

53806

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25820

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

38251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25820

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

38251

Name	NVIDIA TITAN RTX	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark	19986	8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	827	745
Geekbench - OpenCL	138072	53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25820	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25820	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	38251
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	15164	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		799.933

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA TITAN RTX	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	TU102	Capsaicin
Launch date	18 December 2018	26 April 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$1,499
Place in performance rating	91	188
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Design		reference
Price now		$849
Value for money (0-100)		17.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4608	2x 4096
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	280 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	18,600 million	8,900 million
Compute units		128
Floating-point performance		2x 8,192 gflops
Texture fill rate		2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count	3
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Eyefinity
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	277 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	3x 8-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0	DirectX® 12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bus width	384 Bit	2x 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount		8 GB
Memory bandwidth		512 GB / s
Technologies
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore