NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 4608 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 7798
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 41822
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 11616
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 11616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 3 April 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 7798 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 41822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 11616 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 827
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3707
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3353
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3707
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 | 7798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 | 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 41822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 18294 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 3 April 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 90 | 162 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |