NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 19370
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 136722
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 21578
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3290
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 21578
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3290
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 December 2018 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986 vs 19370
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 vs 136722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 827
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 827

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19986
19370
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
827
869
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138072
136722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3290
Name NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986 19370
PassMark - G2D Mark 827 869
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 136722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3290
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 15164 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU102 TU102
Launch date 18 December 2018 13 August 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499 $9,999
Place in performance rating 90 103
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 4608
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 280 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6