NVIDIA TITAN V vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN V and AMD Radeon R9 290X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 14,899 gflops vs 2x 5,632 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 580 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2x 4 GB
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 19.441

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X2

• 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 465.6 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 5120
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1700 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1 GPU 2

30.857 19.441

Compare specifications (specs)