NVIDIA TITAN V vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN V and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 14,899 gflops vs 9,830 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 12297
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 67658
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 205.049
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 18.022
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1292.989
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2391
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 868
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4007.96 vs 3583.136
• 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.8 vs 20.669
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 4193
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 4193

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19884 12297
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	868 882
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	150662 67658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.561 205.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3583.136 4007.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.857 18.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.669 215.8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1504.373 1292.989
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15401 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4193 8455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15401 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4193 8455

Compare specifications (specs)