NVIDIA TITAN V vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN V and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA TITAN V

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 846 MHz
34.4x more texture fill rate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
26.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 192
45.9x better floating-point performance: 14,899 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
31x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 641
Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 441
14.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2012
Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3071
14.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2012
Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 December 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	465.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	5120 vs 192
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	19884 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark	868 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15401 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15401 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1700 MHz

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 1700 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19884

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

868

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15401

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15401

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3071

Name	NVIDIA TITAN V	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	19884	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	868	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	150662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15401	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15401	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193	3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	13111

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA TITAN V	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	Volta	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GV100	GK208
Launch date	7 December 2017	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999
Place in performance rating	149	830
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	5120	192
Texture fill rate	465.6 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	21,100 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	652.8 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1700 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus