NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 22.8x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 vs 53806
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 146.609 vs 141.474
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 3621.344
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 13.132
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 112.973
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 799.933
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 10141
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 5.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 3840
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 12,150 gflops
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3355
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 3840 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 12,150 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 0 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8137 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 190 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 2x 8,192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 277 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |