NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 6316
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 65520
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3714
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3355
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3714
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 65520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 165 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |