NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 9,830 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 4007.96
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 18.022
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1292.989
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2391
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 vs 1 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s vs 307.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 9,830 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67658 vs 65520
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.049 vs 146.609
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.8 vs 163.551
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3355
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67658 vs 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.049 vs 146.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.8 vs 163.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 215.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | GP102 | Greenland |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 | 1 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $599.99 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 239 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 9,830 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |