NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 vs 37928
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 2293.496
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 12.704
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 139.717
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 692.9
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 14915
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 14915
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 vs 4887
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 5,648 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 vs 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 14915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 vs 4887 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 146.609
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3355
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 vs 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 214.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8048 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 4887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10005 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP102 | GP104 |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 222 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1379 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 5,648 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |