NVIDIA TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 22.8x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 8137
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 745
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65368 vs 53806
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 141.474
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 vs 13.132
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 vs 799.933
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10966 vs 10141
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10966 vs 10141

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• 5.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 379.7 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 3840
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 12,150 gflops
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 2513.321
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 43.083
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3686
• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3343
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3686
• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	17881 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	934 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	65368 53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	256.103 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2513.321 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.708 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.083 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1139.382 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10966 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10966 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 38251

Compare specifications (specs)