NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 1539
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 8543
- 59.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 152.6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 11 September 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 vs 1539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 8543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 152.6 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 79% higher pipelines: 800 vs 448
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 362
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | ATI FirePro V8700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | 1539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 | 8543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 | 152.6 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | RV770 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 11 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 576 | 430 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |