NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K10 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 512x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 6
- 448.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2012 vs 5 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K10
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1039 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K10 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
Launch date | 1 May 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 977 | 687 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 850 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 272 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 |