NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40c and NVIDIA GRID K240Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1536
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 212
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4495 vs 2541
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 28 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 212 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 vs 2541 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 245 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | NVIDIA GRID K240Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 61.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.261 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 212 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 | 2541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c | NVIDIA GRID K240Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK110B | GK104 |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $469 |
Place in performance rating | 513 | 488 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |