NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 1280
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 2,637 gflops
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 27 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 640 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops vs 2,637 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4x 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5200 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 46.191
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 814.192
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 50.918
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 180.026
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3306
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3306
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3172 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 65.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 1139.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 88.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 337.583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 630 | 516 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | 2,637 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 640 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 82.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |