NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 2x 128
- 8.7x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3172 vs 676
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 18 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4x 640 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 226 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4x 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3172 vs 676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 410
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 3306
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 3306
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 410 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4196 vs 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4196 vs 3306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3172 | 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 4196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
Code name | GM107 | G92 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 18 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 630 | 467 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 640 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 226 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 8 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 2x 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |