NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 113.3 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 3,625 gflops vs 3,476 gflops
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6284 vs 6153
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 7635
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 7635
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops vs 3,476 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 vs 6153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 7635 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 657 vs 371
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 657 vs 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 657 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 | 6153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2792 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Antigua |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 356 | 373 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $264.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 970 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 3,476 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |