NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 113.3 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 192
- 11.2x better floating-point performance: 3,625 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5936 vs 641
- 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 1087
- 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 1087
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2012
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2012
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 3071
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 3071
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5936 vs 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 391
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 441 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5936 | 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GK208 |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 352 | 830 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 846 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1270 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |