NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 933 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 3,344 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 5562
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 67.829
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1266.685
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 6.495
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 79.909
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 365.384
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 7957
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 7957

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280

• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 389

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8768 5562
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.62 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791.761 1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.457 6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.574 79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	523.29 365.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3337

Compare specifications (specs)