NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 4722
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 64.576
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 336.491
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 6096
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 6096
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 vs 4722 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 64.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 336.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 vs 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 vs 6096 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 389
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 31426
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 389 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 31426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | 4722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 781 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31426 | 75346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 64.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 336.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 356 | 407 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |