NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 12x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12678 vs 2647
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 25 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12678 vs 2647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3690 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 450
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 vs 450 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | AMD FirePro R5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12678 | 2647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 450 | 625 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 25 February 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | $1,099 |
Place in performance rating | 231 | 402 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |